Julio Dal Poz – Upstream Senior Strategy Advisor at Equinor.
Strong assets do not guarantee strong portfolio performance.
Benchmarking reveals the difference.
A discussion on portfolio performance, strategic decision-making and maintaining independent perspective across complex hydrocarbon systems.
Across large-scale upstream portfolios, performance is shaped by more than individual assets.
Reservoirs perform differently.
Projects evolve differently.
Decisions compound over time.
Optimisation improves individual components.
But portfolio-level performance depends on how these components are aligned.
The critical question is not:
“Are individual assets performing well?”
It is:
“How does performance across the portfolio compare to what is achievable?”
Across comparable systems, performance differences are rarely explained by a single factor.
They emerge from:
- how portfolios are structured
- how capital is allocated
- how decisions are sequenced across assets and over time
These differences are not always visible at asset level.
They are expressed across the system.
This is where benchmarking operates at a different level.
Not as comparison alone —
but as a discipline that enables:
- valid comparison across fundamentally different assets
- consistent interpretation across time and conditions
- alignment between asset-level decisions and portfolio-level outcomes
In that context, benchmarking is not only about improving performance within assets.
It is about ensuring that performance across the portfolio reflects what is fully achievable.
Performance leadership is not a function of individual excellence — but of system-level alignment.
'
